El 3/10/2007, a las 17:27, Johannes Schindelin escribió:

quoted text
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Karl Hasselström wrote:
>
>>   2. "push all branches" is the default, but the user intended to  
>> push
>>      only the current branch. She ends up pushing a superset of what
>>      she wanted, which is not easily fixed if she can't be sure that
>>      no one else has pulled from the public repo before she notices
>>      what's happened.
>
> But that is not the default.  Not at all.
>
> The default is to push the refs which the remote and the local side  
> have
> _in common_.

Yes, that's already been covered in this thread, probably in the  
first or second post, and (at least I hope) we've all read it and  
take it as given.

Replace "push all branches" with "push all refs that both sides have  
in common", which is presumably what Karl meant, and the concerns are  
still there.

quoted text
> Maybe we should initialise the "remote.origin.push" variable to
> "completely-bogus-branchname" when you "git init --im-a-newbie"?

How is this comment supposed to help in any way? Please try to think  
about the image you're putting across; as an relatively active and  
prominent contributer in the Git community you are part of the "face"  
of the community.

Cheers,
Wincent

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html