On Tuesday 2007 October 02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted text
> Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> writes:
> > I noticed a couple of places where memcmp() has been used where
> > prefixcmp() would work fine.  I'm tempted to change them too - what do
> > you think? Perhaps a separate patch?
>
> In general, probably it is preferable to have a separate
> "preliminary patch" to normalize the existing code without using
> the new infrastructure (i.e. REF_* macros), and then to have the
> main patch.  That way would make the main patch more about
> mechanical conversion, which would be easier to verify
> independently.

I only noticed them memcmp() use while I was reviewing the PATH_REFS patch :-)  
So making it preliminary would have meant travelling backwards in time.

I imagine I can do a bit of rebase-interactive to rearrange should that be the 
route you'd like me to go.  Your call.


Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html