... and call it "Receiving objects" when over stdin to look clearer to end users. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> --- diff --git a/index-pack.c b/index-pack.c index 2f149a4..d32c7b9 100644 --- a/index-pack.c +++ b/index-pack.c @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ static void *fill(int min) die("early EOF"); die("read error on input: %s", strerror(errno)); } + if (verbose && from_stdin) + display_throughput(&progress, ret); input_len += ret; } while (input_len < min); ...

Doh... funny... This was only yesterday; I installed 1.5.2.4 (stupidly, a typo) and the 1.5.3.4 man pages. If I'd just done a "git stash" or something I would've realized that I was using an older version... Cheers, Wincent -

Can anybody reproduce the following behaviour? Basically all the author and committer date formats documented in the git-show man page work except for "%ai" and "%ci". This is with Git 1.5.2.4 running on Darwin 9.0.0: $ git show -s --pretty=format:"%ad" Sun Oct 28 20:58:39 2007 +0100 $ git show -s --pretty=format:"%aD" Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:58:39 +0100 $ git show -s --pretty=format:"%ar" 17 hours ago $ git show -s --pretty=format:"%at" 1193601519 $ git show -s ...

Is there some guarantee that the result of that subtraction is still within the string? Morten -

From 51b364c9c87bec89556a2089cc5363c588ea2ff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Knoll <lars@trolltech.com> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:27:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Speedup scanning for excluded files. Try to avoid a lot of work scanning for excluded files, by caching some more information when setting up the exclusion data structure. Speeds up 'git runstatus' on a repository containing the Qt sources by 30% and reduces the amount of instructions executed (as measured by valgrind) by ...

Try to avoid a lot of work while scanning for excluded files, by caching some more information when setting up the exclusion data structure. Speeds up 'git runstatus' on a repository containing the Qt sources by 30% and reduces the amount of instructions executed (as measured by valgrind) by a factor of 2. --- I did a short timing measurement on the git repository itself, the timings without and with the patch give: [lars@dahab git (speedup)]$ time git runstatus > /dev/null real ...

No longer talk about Cogito since it's deprecated. Some scripts (such as git-reset or git-branch) have undergone builtinification so adjust the text to reflect this. Fix a typo in the description of git-show-branch (merges are indicated by a `-', not by a `.'). git-pull/git-push do not seem to use the dumb git-ssh-fetch/git-ssh-upload (the text was probably missing a word). Adjust a link that wasn't rendered properly because it was wrapped. Signed-off-by: Benoit Sigoure ...

"skip" should be closer to the "bad" and "good" options, since it's most similar to them in that list. Dave. -

see, 3x -- franky -

Sinc eneither 31 _nor_ 32 bits is really enough, it's perfectly fine to just check that the size of "off_t" is *bigger* than 4 bytes, which my pseudo-patch did. Linus -

When i merged git.git into git-gui with subtree strategy, I found all histories of git.git merged into histories of git-gui (from 584 history entries to 11985). Is it possible that only histories related to git-gui subdirectory in git.git(i.e. histories displayed by git-log git-gui) are merged into? 1. my configuration: ~/git-gui$ git-remote show git * remote git URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git Tracked remote branches master ~/git-gui$ git-remote show origin * ...

Right, would have I known a single word of Tcl, I would have provided patches for that long time ago btw :P --=20 =C2=B7O=C2=B7 Pierre Habouzit =C2=B7=C2=B7O madcoder@debia= n.org OOO http://www.madism.org

FWIW, I have exactly the same problem under OS X. I've never figured out a pattern that gives a guaranteed copy - I'll try playing around today and see what I can find. Actually, while I'm here, gitk semi-regularly ignores ⌘Q, which ought to quit on OS X.-

Thanks. It's easier to read if you briefly describe the differences between the replacement patch and the previous version of the patch below the three-dash lines. See for example Lars Knoll's patch from today <200710290959.32538.lars@trolltech.com>. -

The nearest set theory operation would be "difference" (or "complement"); that does not require that the subtrahend is a subset of the minuend. Dave. -

Git had previously been using the $PATH for scripts--a previous patch moved exec'ed commands to also use the $PATH. For consistency "help -a" should also list commands in the $PATH. The main commands are still listed from the git_exec_path(), but the $PATH is walked and other git commands (probably extensions) are listed. Signed-off-by: Scott R Parish <srp@srparish.net> --- help.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 files changed, 120 insertions(+), ...

What version of StGIT are you using? You could try 'stg branch --create test v2.6.24-rc1^{commit} but I thought latest StGIT adds this by default. -- Catalin -

Hi Pierre, Thanks. You are the man! It works perfectly now. Regards, Kevin -

Fine. "Send to repository", then. My point is that if "push" is a technical term, then it doesn't belong in the GUI, and if it isn't, then it should be translated like any other UI element. -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ -

Hi, So all you're saying is: it is not possible. Well, discussion ended, I guess. Ciao, Dscho -

Well, the confusion is that we refer to things that look like "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git" as if it were a URL. In fact, you did so yourself in the last paragraph above. "People who think that git URL's".... but in fact, whether or not Universal Resource Locators (URL's) in the RFC 3986 sense requires quoting doesn't matter whether or not they are web pages or not. If they are formal URL's in the sense of RFC 3986, it doesn't matter whether they are http URL's, or ldap URL's, ...

Git remote names already aren't "url"s in the http sense. We say "master:some.host/file/goes here/without/any/stupid/web-escapes" for the ssh names, and the same goes for "file:///name here" etc. People who think that git URL's are web-pages had better wake up and smell the coffee. They aren't. They never were. They never *should* be. This whole argument is idiotic. The #branch format was a mistake of cogito. Cogito is dead. Get over it already. We have a format already, and it ...