On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:Sure, but "URL" in human-speak has nothing to do with an RFC. I dislike language-lawyerese. Why the hell do people think that human language should follow the RFC's? Git addresses look like URL's, and they act like URL's, but dammit, git isn't a web browser, and it's not interested in acting like one. And "standards" are only as good as they are useful. XML is a piece of crap despite being a standard because it makes no sense. Similarly, "URL quoting" is a piece of crap when _it_ makes no sense. Having a RFC or an ISO standard doesn't change anything, and doesn't imply that human communication (or indeed, even machine communication) should care. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Luciano Rocha | usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
