Re: [PATCH] git-format-patch: Don't number patches when there's only one

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andreas Ericsson <ae@...>
Cc: <git@...>, <spearce@...>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 5:44 am

Hi,

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:


I think you should not use "-n" if you do not want to have the numbers.  
In circumstances as yours, where you can have patch series larger than 
one, I imagine that the "[PATCH 1/1]" bears an important information, 
which is not present in "[PATCH]": this patch series contains only one 
patch.

IOW I do not like your patch: too much DWIDNS (Do What I Did NOT Say) for 
me.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] git-format-patch: Don't number patches when ther..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Oct 22, 5:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] git-format-patch: Number patches when there are ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Nov 3, 12:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH] git-format-patch: Number patches when there are ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Nov 3, 8:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] git-format-patch: Don't number patches when ther..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Oct 22, 6:22 am)