Shawn,
sp/push-refspec definitely needs more work (see below).


On Oct 20, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Steffen Prohaska wrote:

quoted text
>
> On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Steffen Prohaska wrote:
>>>
>>> But you need a full refspec starting with 'refs/heads/' if you  
>>> want to
>>> create a new branch on the remote side.
>>
>> No.  Not if the name is the same on the local side.
>
> You're right. The documentation of git-send-pack says what you're
> saying:
>
> [...]
>
> Until you corrected me, I believed that new branches will never
> be created on the remote side unless a full ref is used. That is
> I expected that only
>
>    git push origin refs/heads/work/topic
>
> would work.
>
> I thought this would be another safety net -- kind of a reminder
> not to push the wrong branch by accident.
>
> I still like the idea, but apparently git didn't ever support what
> I thought it would.

And I even fixed the behavior to match my expectation in a patch
which made it to spearce/pu:


d869233c62688742968663c4e8b5ff20a50a5011

     push, send-pack: fix test if remote branch exists for colon-less  
refspec

     A push must fail if the remote ref does not yet exist and the  
refspec
     does not start with refs/. Remote refs must explicitly be  
created with
     their full name.

     This commit adds some tests and fixes the existence check in  
send-pack.


sp/push-refspec definitely needs some more work.

	Steffen


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html