On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:04:56PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:Or perhaps the index format could be extended to include a new field for value=name pairs instead of overloading the name field. But as I said, I have no idea how feasible it would be to change git to support another arbitrary length field in the index/tree file. I think the opposite approach would be better. Let git provide set/get/delete attribute operations and leave it at that. Then external programs can do what they want with that data and add/remove/modify tags as necessary (and also include the smarts to not, e.g. remove the permissions on all files if the git repo is checked out to a FAT fs). -- David Härdeman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| monstr | [PATCH 26/60] microblaze_v4: time support |
| Jon Smirl | Re: 463 kernel developers missing! |
| Andrew Morton | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jiri Olsa | [PATCHv5 0/2] net: fix race in the receive/select |
