On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:04:56PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Or perhaps the index format could be extended to include a new field for
value=name pairs instead of overloading the name field.
But as I said, I have no idea how feasible it would be to change git to
support another arbitrary length field in the index/tree file.
I think the opposite approach would be better. Let git provide
set/get/delete attribute operations and leave it at that. Then external
programs can do what they want with that data and add/remove/modify tags
as necessary (and also include the smarts to not, e.g. remove the
permissions on all files if the git repo is checked out to a FAT fs).
--
David Härdeman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html