also sprach david@lang.hm <david@lang.hm> [2007.10.02.2129 +0100]:
How could there be a conflict if you can't make local changes
because you can't represent the attributes locally/natively?
In simple terms, let (content,A,B) be an object with content
"content" and extended attributes A,B, and B cannot be represented
locally, but a new object is committed with a change to attribute
A (content2,A2), then the result is (content2,A2,B), as B simply
comes from the (corresponding object of the) parent.
Or am I totally misunderstanding?
--=20
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
=20
when compared to windoze, unix is an operating system.
=20
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net