Hi,

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Carl Worth wrote:

quoted text
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:46:56 +0100 (BST), Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > And why is that?
> >
> > Well, if the OP had used "git push <bla> master" instead of "... 
> > master:master", it would have worked.  I am unaware of any tutorial 
> > that suggests the latter, only of tutorials that suggest the former.
> 
> OK. I was wrong. Somehow I got stuck thinking that "git push <bla> 
> master" wouldn't create a new remote master branch if it didn't 
> previously exist. (It's bizarre that I forgot since I've used that for a 
> long time).
> 
> Sorry about the noise.

Nothing to be sorry about.  It got me thinking.  People propose that "git 
push <nick> master:blub" should create the branch "refs/heads/blub" on the 
remote side.

My initial reaction was "then you have to be precise, because we do not 
know if you want to push it as a branch, or as a lightweight tag".

But then I stepped back a little: What is most likely meant when you say 
"master:blub" and there is no tag/branch of name "blub" on the remote 
side?  Exactly, you want a branch to be created.

_Except_ if you had a typo, such as "git push ko master:po" where you want 
to be warned that that ref is not present on the remote side.

So I am less opposed to making "master:blub" automatically create a branch 
"blub" if it does not exist yet.  But opposed nevertheless.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html