Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matthieu Moy
Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2007 - 1:07 am

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:


Well, if rebase itself conflicts, it will stop and tell you about
conflicts, then you'll have to "rebase --continue". If unstash fails,
you'll have to resolve the conflicts, and probably do "commit", or
continue working afterwards. You don't have to deal with both at the
same time, but both do exist, and they have to be taken care of
differently.

For an advanced user with good understanding of the flow, that's OK,
but I'm still afraid of the confusion for not-so-advanced users.

But that's not a strong argument against auto-stash, just one
downside.


You're in a better position than me to juge on that point.


That alone would already be a real improvement.

I'd add this to be consistant with "git status". I find the "needs
update" really short, and especially confusing for centralized systems
users, for whom "needs update" would probably mean "new version
available, please run '$VCS update'".

diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index 2e40a34..3745a48 100644
--- a/read-cache.c
+++ b/read-cache.c
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ int refresh_index(struct index_state *istate, unsigned int flags, const char **p
                        }
                        if (quiet)
                                continue;
-                       printf("%s: needs update\n", ce->name);
+                       printf("%s: Changed but not updated\n", ce->name);
                        has_errors = 1;
                        continue;
                }


-- 
Matthieu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
What's cooking in git.git (topics), Junio C Hamano, (Thu Sep 6, 1:52 am)
What's cooking in git.git (topics), Junio C Hamano, (Fri Sep 14, 3:04 am)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Sep 14, 11:30 am)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Sep 14, 4:47 pm)
What's cooking in git.git (topics), Junio C Hamano, (Wed Sep 26, 1:05 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Carlos Rica, (Wed Sep 26, 2:07 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Sep 26, 2:44 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Tom Clarke, (Wed Sep 26, 2:53 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Jeff King, (Wed Sep 26, 7:36 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), David Kastrup, (Wed Sep 26, 11:08 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), David Kastrup, (Wed Sep 26, 11:43 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Jeff King, (Thu Sep 27, 6:30 am)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Daniel Barkalow, (Thu Sep 27, 8:24 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Jeff King, (Mon Oct 1, 9:16 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Junio C Hamano, (Mon Oct 1, 10:01 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Jeff King, (Mon Oct 1, 10:08 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Jeff King, (Mon Oct 1, 10:13 pm)
What's cooking in git.git (topics), Junio C Hamano, (Mon Oct 1, 10:53 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Steven Grimm, (Mon Oct 1, 11:41 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Steffen Prohaska, (Mon Oct 1, 11:44 pm)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Matthieu Moy, (Tue Oct 2, 12:03 am)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Junio C Hamano, (Tue Oct 2, 12:21 am)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Matthieu Moy, (Tue Oct 2, 1:07 am)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Oct 2, 5:52 am)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Daniel Barkalow, (Tue Oct 2, 10:00 am)
Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics), Junio C Hamano, (Tue Oct 2, 10:44 am)