Re: should git command and git-command be equivalent?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Symonds
Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 - 5:28 am

On 16/10/2007, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> wrote:

If you use the contrib/completion/git-completion.bash script, you can
type "git st<TAB>", and it'll complete it for you. Well, it did, until
git-stash came along and ruined it...

At any rate, the bash completion also completes things like branch
names, which can be immensely helpful.


Dave.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: should git command and git-command be equivalent?, Matthieu Moy, (Tue Oct 16, 12:48 am)
Re: should git command and git-command be equivalent?, Matthieu Moy, (Tue Oct 16, 1:55 am)
Re: should git command and git-command be equivalent?, David Symonds, (Tue Oct 16, 5:28 am)
Re: should git command and git-command be equivalent?, Matthieu Moy, (Tue Oct 16, 7:46 am)