Hi,

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Petr Baudis wrote:

quoted text
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 11:38:00PM +0200, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > @@ -286,15 +285,6 @@ a gitweb interface, at <a href="http://repo.or.cz/">http://repo.or.cz/</a>.</p>
> >  
> >  <dl>
> >  
> > -<dt id="cogito">Cogito</dt>
> > -<dd>
> > -<a href="http://git.or.cz/cogito/">Cogito</a>
> > -is a popular version control system on top of Git.
> > -It aims at seamless user interface and ease of use, providing
> > -generally smoother user experience than the "raw" Git interface
> > -and indeed also many other version control systems. However, it
> > -also lacks many advanced capabilities of Git and is currently
> > -being slowly phased out.</dd>
> >  
> >  <dt id="stgit">StGIT</dt>
> >  <dd><a href="http://www.procode.org/stgit/">Stacked Git</a> provides
> 
> I'm not sure this is good idea, Cogito is still quite frequently used
> and it should be documented that it exists.

I agree.  But maybe it could be marked as unmaintained?  Maybe someone 
steps up to maintain it.  Or, even better, comes up with a list of "this 
is what I like do regularly with cogito, but there's no easy way with core 
git" issues.

In related news, I recently thought about the url#branch issue.

There were three arguments against it AFAIR: "#" is a comment marker, and 
this syntax is not extensible to more than one branch names.  And that the 
branch name is not really a part of the URL.

Turns out that I am not so sure about the last two issues.

It is easily extensible to more than one branch by remote#branch1#branch2, 
and in a very real sense, this is a resource locator.

And we could replace the "#" by every character that is illegal in ref 
names as well as URLs.  I propose SPC.  ('#' is allowed in refnames.)

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html