Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
I'm neither too. But I don't think Git is in a niche. OK, well,
in the overall world of software development its certainly in the
niche of version control, as uh, it doesn't do Enterprise Resource
Planning and Large Scale Embezzlement of Monies (ERPaLSEM).
Actually I've seen a number of people on the interweb saying things
like they were switching their project to Git because they felt
it had more staying power than say Monotone or Mercurial, partly
because the kernel devs were actively using it, partly because the
file formats are so simple and sane, and partly because lots of
other projects are using it or are seriously considering it.
Yes, this attitude *shocked the hell out of me*. I really did not
expect it. I nearly keeled over and died when I realized what the
folks in the back corner of the room were saying.
WINE uses Git. Some folks were outright pissed off that there
was only one committer in WINE. I think they felt the project
was maybe going to die because there was only one committer who
could apply patches. That may wind up being true (there's only so
far that one human can scale without trusted helpers for different
submodules of a large system) but its not Git's fault, or any other
DVCS's fault for that matter. At least its easy to fork WINE.
On the other hand active participants of two major organizations (KDE
and Eclipse) are starting to seriously look at Git. The interest
in Git is growing in both of those groups, which can only be good
for us. We'll learn more about how these groups do development,
and how we can best help them to accomplish more.
--
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html