Re: [PATCH] Replacing the system call pread() with lseek()/xread()/lseek() sequence.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stefan-W. Hahn <stefan.hahn@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 - 5:41 pm

Stefan-W. Hahn wrote:

Seems to be style inconsistancy between current_offset = and rc= I
believe the former is preferred.


How likely are we ever to be in the right place here?  Seems vanishingly
small putting us firmly in the four syscalls per call space.  I wonder
if git ever actually cares about the seek location.  ie if we could stop
reading and resetting it.  Probabally not worth working it out I guess
as any _sane_ system has one.


-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Replacing the system call pread() with lseek()/x..., Andy Whitcroft, (Tue Jan 9, 5:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Replacing the system call pread() with lseek()/x..., Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Jan 9, 7:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Replacing the system call pread() with lseek()/x..., Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Jan 9, 8:30 pm)