Re: blameview and file contents

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Junio C Hamano
Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 1:30 am

"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:


My feeling is that adding "See SPECIFYING REVISIONS section" to
Porcelain documentation is a very good idea, but unwanted
baggage for plumbing descriptions if added everywhere.  The
target audience of the latter is supposed to know what "object
name" is, so:

 <object>::
-	The sha1 identifier of the object.
+	The name of the object to show.

should be sufficient.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
blameview and file contents, Aneesh Kumar, (Mon Jan 29, 11:46 pm)
Re: blameview and file contents, Shawn O. Pearce, (Mon Jan 29, 11:54 pm)
Re: blameview and file contents, Aneesh Kumar, (Tue Jan 30, 12:22 am)
Re: blameview and file contents, Shawn O. Pearce, (Tue Jan 30, 12:29 am)
Re: blameview and file contents, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jan 30, 1:30 am)