Hi,

On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

quoted text
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Then that would mean 250 calls to git-for-each-ref, wouldn't it?
> 
> Well, I think it was Johannes that said once for each ref.  But either 
> which way, it's a totally unacceptable load with resulting unacceptable 
> latency.

No. I would never say that you have to run for-each-ref for each ref. 
That's plain stupid.

BTW I take some satisfaction in that you finally agreed (in another email) 
that some post-creation caching is necessary.

I would be even more satisfied if you finally agreed that it is a good 
practice to separate conceptually different things, and not continued ad 
infinitum (and ad nauseam) arguing that .git/info/refs should serve dumb 
transports, and gitweb, and eventually bring peace to everybody on this 
planet.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html