"Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:

quoted text
> On 1/10/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>> This comes on top of yours.
>>
>> I'm reproducing all the merges in linux-2.6 history to make sure
>> the base one, yours and this produce the same result (the same
>> clean merge, or the same unmerged index and the same diff from
>> HEAD).  So far it is looking good.
>
> Yep. Tried the monster merge on it: 1m15sec on that small laptop.

Is that supposed to be a good news?  It sounds awfully slow.

quoted text
> For whatever reason your patch left an "if (cache_dirty) flush_cache()",
> that's after my patch + yours. Had it removed.

That's because my copy of "your patch" has the fix-up I
suggested to remove the flush from process_renames() already --
the removal of that one and removal from process_entry() you did
logically belong to each other.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html