Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:

quoted text
> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
>
> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> index 55cd984..58a7c92 100644
> --- a/.gitignore
> +++ b/.gitignore
> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ git-verify-pack
>  git-verify-tag
>  git-whatchanged
>  git-write-tree
> +git-zip-tree
>  git-core-*/?*
>  gitweb/gitweb.cgi
>  test-date

That is sensible.

Although it was my fault applying it already to "master" without
asking this question first, I started to wonder how many more
archive format people would want, and if it might make more
sense to consolidate git-*-tree into a single frontend with an
option to specify the archiver.

We would obviously need to keep git-tar-tree as a backward
compatibility alias for "git archive-tree -f tar", but doing
things that way we do not have to introduce unbounded number of
new git-{zip,rar,...}-tree programs.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html