On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Johannes Schindelin wrote:If we didn't mark them, then clearing them would be a no-op, so nobody really cares. Right. The point is, some logic can choose to mark commits UNINTERESTING without even parsing that commit, and it would be a good thing. You only need to parse the commit once you decide that you need its parents (or it's tree, of course), but you may be able to mark it uninteresting before that. This is why it is _wrong_ to care about the "parsed" bit when clearing the flags. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Nick Piggin | Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.26.3 |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| David Symonds | Re: git and binary files |
| Sam Song | Fwd: [OT] Re: Git via a proxy server? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [PATCH 0/6] Initial subproject support (RFC?) |
| Petr Baudis | Re: repo.or.cz wishes? |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Wasting our Freedom |
| Alexey Suslikov | OT: OpenBSD on Asus eeePC |
| ropers | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| David Howells | [PATCH 6/7] FS-Cache: CacheFiles: ia64: missing copy_page export [try #13] |
| Valdis.Kletnieks | Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck |
| Chris Mason | Re: [PATCH][RFC] fast file mapping for loop |
| Nikolai Joukov | Re: [ANNOUNCE] RAIF: Redundant Array of Independent Filesystems |
