Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Friday, June 16, 2006 - 1:56 pm

Linus Torvalds wrote:

Perhaps we shouldn't rely on stderr, and instead have a backchannel as part of the 
protocol itself.  After all, the protocol already does packetization, so all it needs is a 
reliable way to pick out the error/status packets; we could even combine that with a 
machine-readable code (like SMTP et al) that could get interpreted by the other side as 
needed.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Goo GGooo, (Thu Jun 15, 6:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jun 15, 7:46 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Goo GGooo, (Thu Jun 15, 10:49 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jun 15, 11:39 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Uwe Zeisberger, (Fri Jun 16, 5:40 am)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Jun 16, 1:56 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, bert hubert, (Fri Jun 16, 3:44 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Jun 16, 3:52 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Jun 16, 5:22 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Michal Ludvig, (Mon Jun 19, 8:01 pm)
Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 19, 8:22 pm)