On 5/22/06, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
quoted text
> Did you do a "top" at any time just before this all happened? It _sounds_
> like it might actually be a memory leak on the CVS server side, and the
> problem may (or may not) be due to the optimization that keeps a single
> long-running CVS server instance for the whole process.

Running a few tests right now. Looks like cvs (Debian/etch 1.12.9-13)
itself is not leaking any memory. The Perl (Debian/etch
5.8.7-something and now 5.8.8-4) process OTOH is visibly allocating
memory. Starts off at 4MB and gets up to ~17MB by the time it has done
6K commits.

I am trying to figure out whether the leak is in the script or in the
Perl implementation, using PadWalk, Devel::Leak and friends. If the
leak is here, I can't see it (yet).

quoted text
> I wouldn't be in the least surprised if that ends up triggering a slow
> leak in CVS itself, and then CVS runs out of memory.

Or a slow leak in Perl? The 5.8.8 release notes do talk about some
leaks being fixed, but this 5.8.8 isn't making a difference.

Working on it.



martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html