Hi,

On Sat, 20 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted text
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, 20 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > As for --check: how about having yet another diff "format": 
> > DIFF_FORMAT_CHECK? Instead of showing the diff, it only shows the line(s) 
> > which are offending.
> 
> Never thought of that but I think it makes sense.  
> 
> I liked the way Sean did the --summary; I am wondering if we
> could clean up the --with-* stuff in a similar way.  We
> currently do "if DIFF_FORMAT_XYZ or with_xyz then do this" which
> is quite honestly disgusting (my fault).

I do not think the --with-* stuff can be done in a similar way. If I do 
"git log --summary -p", I do not get a summary. The only way to "clean it 
up" would be to add a linked list of diff_formats (to preserve the order). 

But frankly, I think that is overkill. After all, how often have you 
dreamt about showing first the patch, then the summary, and maybe a 
diffstat, and after that the patch again, for each commit?

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html