[PATCH] Document that "git add" only adds non-ignored files.

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw away revs hidden by a graft. by Jakub Narebski on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:00 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Re: [PATCH] built-in tar-tree and remote tar-tree by Jakub Narebski on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 2:56 pm. (1 message)
From: Santi
Date: Friday, May 19, 2006 - 2:02 pm

Signed-off-by: Santi B
From: Junio C Hamano
Date: Friday, May 19, 2006 - 2:56 pm

Thanks for the reminder, but I wonder if it is good to update
the description of this command, and ls-files to use the
same wording for consistency.  We seem to use <pathspec> to mean
"this is not necessarily a filename -- we glob", so that may be
a good candidate (we do not have <pathspec> in glossary yet --
we would need to add).

Please don't touch description for diff-* family -- right now,
they say <path>, because they do not glob.  If we decide that it
is a good idea to glob (which I suspect we don't for the
low-level stuff, but we probably do for the "git-diff" wrapper),
we would update the code and the description at the same time.



-

From: Santi
Date: Saturday, May 20, 2006 - 2:54 am

OK.

Santi
-

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw away revs hidden by a graft. by Jakub Narebski on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:00 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Re: [PATCH] built-in tar-tree and remote tar-tree by Jakub Narebski on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 2:56 pm. (1 message)