Re: ***DONTUSE*** Re: [PATCH] Use a hashtable for objects instead of a sorted list

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Junio C Hamano
Date: Sunday, February 12, 2006 - 11:34 am

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:


No, I do not think so.  In the current "master", "next", "pu"
picture, "pu" merges js/obj with the "8856cc69" commit and then
shallow and bind comes later.  That merged version is what I am
testing, and also its second parent, which is "master" plus
hashtable.  In either case, shallow and bind are not part of the
picture.


That is not your fault, and I did not mean to sound I am unhappy
about *you*.  I am indeed unhappy because I did not see anything
obviously or subtly wrong with your patch after I moved call to
hashtable_index() in find_object().

But I think Linus nailed it.  I'll see if I can understand his
explanation.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Use a hashtable for objects instead of a sorte ..., Alexandre Julliard, (Sun Feb 12, 1:52 am)
Re: ***DONTUSE*** Re: [PATCH] Use a hashtable for objects ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Feb 12, 10:26 am)
Re: ***DONTUSE*** Re: [PATCH] Use a hashtable for objects ..., Junio C Hamano, (Sun Feb 12, 11:34 am)