Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

quoted text
> I think I agree. Especially if doing "git commit -v", the _top_ of the 
> status message is what you'd normally be most aware of. I think. 

Well the exactly same reasoning on my part, who keeps tons of
untracked files in his repository, left the patch output there.
Otherwise I have to scroll off a long "untracked files" list to
get to the patch ;-).

But even with that gripe, I'd agree that patch at the end would
be a better choice.  The user asked for a patch so she wouldn't
fail to see it even if many '#' lines precede the patch.  With
the current ordering, '#' lines will most likely be ignored.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html