Jakub Narebski wrote:It is. At least for kernel.org, the issue isn't that CGI is expensive, its that I/O is expensive. IMO yes, since most major browsers, caches, and spiders support these headers. Yes, a good point to note. Mostly true: you must also consider HTTP_ACCEPT That would be a good start, and suffice for many cases. If the CGI can simply stat(2) files rather than executing git-* programs, that would increase efficiency quite a bit. A core problem with cache hints via HTTP headers (last-modified, etc.) is that you don't achieve caching across multiple clients, just across repeated queries from the same client (or caching proxy). At least for the RSS/Atom feeds and the git main page, it makes no sense to regenerate that data repeatedly. Internally, gitweb would need to do a stat() on key files, and return pre-generated XML for the feeds if the stat() reveals no changes. Ditto for the front page. CGI version of gitweb. But again, mod_perl vs. CGI isn't the issue. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Andy Whitcroft | Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 -- x86_64 blade hard hangs |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.26-rc1-git9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 |
git: | |
| Andy Grover | [PATCH 01/21] RDS: Socket interface |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
