hoi :) On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:50:45PM +0100, Josef Weidendorfer wrote:y=20 es odules Why not simply use a shared object database instead? You can still have an alternative to some standalone bare repository of the submodule if you do not like to store submodule objects in the supermodule repository. --=20 Martin Waitz
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default |
| Maciej W. Rozycki | [PATCH 2/2] acpi: Disable IRQ 0 through I/O APIC for some HP systems |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Ryan Hope | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
git: | |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: [PATCH] use natural ordering to display list of branches. |
| David Kastrup | Terminology question about remote branches. |
| David Kastrup | Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change? |
| Johannes Schindelin | [PATCH 1/2] clone: Add an option to set up a mirror |
| Martin Toft | Mysterious transfer speed differences |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status |
| Richard Daemon | OpenBSD 4.3 running in VirtualBox? Anyone have it working properly? |
| Diana Eichert | Re: In Memoriam: Jun-ichiro Hagino |
| binto | Before & After Under The Giant Lock |
| Florent Thoumie | Re: New wpi driver |
| Peter Jeremy | Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow? |
| Dirk Engling | Re: Strange keyboard (viral?) behaviour |
