Re: [RFC] Possible optimization for gitweb

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 - 6:22 pm

[Please Cc: git@vger.kernel.org]

Junio C Hamano wrote:


The only problem that you can't use --parents with "history" view, because
together with --full-history it shows also all merges (--full-history
without --parents doesn't show merges which does not affect given file or
directory; the sequence in which --parents and --full-history are taken is
a bit strange to me). So you have to keep current parse_commit (or extend
it), and if I remember correctly you do that. 

I'm also for --skip (not --start-count), although... --start-count with
--max-count seems more natural; one place it can be confusing is that we
count skipped commits or not? I.e. we use --start-count=10 --max-count=20
to get second 10 of commits, or --skip=10 --max-count=10 to get second 10
of commits?
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] Possible optimization for gitweb, Jakub Narebski, (Tue Dec 19, 6:22 pm)
[PATCH] rev-list: Add a new option --skip., Robert Fitzsimons, (Tue Dec 19, 8:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rev-list: Add a new option --skip., Junio C Hamano, (Tue Dec 19, 9:09 pm)
[PATCH] rev-list: Document --skip and add test cases., Robert Fitzsimons, (Wed Dec 20, 10:59 am)