login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sean <seanlkml@...>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@...>, <git@...>
Date: Monday, December 11, 2006 - 11:39 pm

On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Sean wrote:

I do agree with Sean, both for the stability reason, but perhaps even more 
because I personally think it would just be better to have a separate 
"[color]" subsection.

In fact, I'd almost prefer to see

	[color]
		diff = auto

over

	[diff]
		color = auto

exactly because once we have different things that take colorization 
arguments, it's just nicer to have them all together (and we already have 
"status", and now we're getting "branch" too.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Andy Parkins, (Mon Dec 11, 6:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Sean, (Mon Dec 11, 8:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Dec 11, 9:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Sean, (Mon Dec 11, 9:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Dec 11, 11:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Dec 12, 1:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Dec 12, 1:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Dec 12, 3:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Dec 11, 6:47 pm)
speck-geostationary