That's because fread() will block until it gets all data. Did you actually
ever try this with a uncached tree and did you compare what you got with a
plain "read()".
On older kernels, I guarantee that you get 4kB at a time for reads, even
for a blocking pipe. Because we have bigger pipe buffers these days, it
_may_ return 64kB at a time every time, but only if the writer is much
faster than the reader.
Based on the fact that you say that "read()" was ten times slower than
fread(), I very much suspect you got 4kB at a time, and then slept 100ms
each time or something.
Anyway, you should seriously also check the case when "git rev-list" is
slow because you have cold caches and unpacked objects. You can't wait for
it to synchronously write a thousand lines or so - that could take
seconds.
something like
fcntl(fileno(file), F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
will do it, and then your loop should look something like
for (;;) {
int count = read(fileno(file), buf, BUFSIZE);
if (!count) {
/* All done, no more to read */
return 0;
}
if (count < 0) {
if (errno == EAGAIN)
break;
if (errno == EINTR)
continue;
/* Anything else is fatal - report error */
return -1;
}
... handle 'count' new bytes here ...
}
.. this is the EAGAIN case ..
either set polling on the file descriptor, or use a
timer here yo get back to this loop eventually.
looks about right.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html