Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Carl Worth <cworth@...>
Cc: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@...>, <git@...>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2006 - 6:25 pm

Hi,

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Carl Worth wrote:


I suggest "commit". How about this: after editing the file, you tell git 
that you finished editing it by doing

	git commit the-edited-file.txt

Hmmm?

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Nov 30, 6:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Josef Weidendorfer, (Thu Nov 30, 6:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Michael K. Edwards, (Thu Nov 30, 5:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Nov 30, 6:26 pm)