On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Carl Worth wrote:If so, you should make it a special case. I refuse to believe in the "people who know what the hell they are doing should work more at it" philosophy. The "git commit -a" behaviour as it is now is better than the alternatives, exactly because it's more flexible. It _allows_ you to not commit anything at all (and as already mentioned, there are cases where that is exactly what you want). If you want to have a "-a by default", then that you require _you_ to do more work, and no, it's NOT an excuse to say "I'm a clueless newbie, and I don't know how to set a config option, so I think it's the smart and beautiful people who should suffer for my shortcomings". You can even do it by doing an alias like [alias] ci = commit -a and then you can revel in your CVS-induced mudpit all you want. Just don't try to convince people who have gotten over that braindamage to live in the same muck with you. Problem solved. For all I care, we can make that alias a default one, so people who just can't get their mind out of the gutter that is CVS can continue with their evil ways. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Yinghai Lu | Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: check for and defend against BIOS memory corruption |
| Frederik Deweerdt | [-mm patch] remove tcp header from tcp_v4_check (take #2) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching |
git: | |
