Re: git and bzr

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andreas Ericsson
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2006 - 5:45 am

Raimund Bauer wrote:

Sounds sane. Especially if we couple it with a hint for the user to use 
"commit -a" when he/she wants to do blanket commits.

So in essence that would mean:
If no pathspecs are given and index matches current HEAD, print out
"Nothing to commit but changes in working tree. Assuming 'git commit -a'

and then act accordingly. Carl, do you think that would satisfy the 
desires of your RedHat peers? Always doing '-a' by default is terribly 
wrong for those of us who actually use partial commits a lot, and it 
would also rob git of a lot of its power.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: git and bzr, Jakub Narebski, (Tue Nov 28, 11:06 am)
Re: git and bzr, Nicholas Allen, (Tue Nov 28, 11:58 am)
Re: git and bzr, Nicholas Allen, (Tue Nov 28, 12:11 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Andy Parkins, (Tue Nov 28, 12:40 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Nicholas Allen, (Tue Nov 28, 1:37 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Nicholas Allen, (Tue Nov 28, 2:26 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Martin Langhoff, (Tue Nov 28, 2:40 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 28, 2:49 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Shawn Pearce, (Tue Nov 28, 2:53 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Nicholas Allen, (Tue Nov 28, 3:00 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 28, 3:13 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 28, 3:25 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 28, 3:41 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Nicholas Allen, (Tue Nov 28, 3:46 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Nicholas Allen, (Tue Nov 28, 3:48 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Nov 29, 3:49 am)
Re: git and bzr, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Nov 29, 3:52 am)
Re: git and bzr, Jakub Narebski, (Wed Nov 29, 4:01 am)
Re: git and bzr, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Nov 29, 10:29 am)
Re: git and bzr, Marko Macek, (Wed Nov 29, 11:54 am)
Re: git and bzr, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Nov 29, 1:07 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Jon Loeliger, (Wed Nov 29, 1:37 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Nov 29, 1:45 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Jakub Narebski, (Wed Nov 29, 1:49 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Carl Worth, (Wed Nov 29, 5:05 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Carl Worth, (Wed Nov 29, 5:08 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Raimund Bauer, (Wed Nov 29, 11:59 pm)
Re: git and bzr, Carl Worth, (Thu Nov 30, 12:17 am)
Re: git and bzr, Alan Chandler, (Thu Nov 30, 1:31 am)
Re: git and bzr, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy, (Thu Nov 30, 2:01 am)
Re: git and bzr, Alan Chandler, (Thu Nov 30, 2:30 am)
Re: git and bzr, Steven Grimm, (Thu Nov 30, 2:39 am)
Re: git and bzr, Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Nov 30, 3:19 am)
Re: git and bzr, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy, (Thu Nov 30, 4:25 am)
Re: git and bzr, Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Nov 30, 5:23 am)
Re: git and bzr, Andreas Ericsson, (Thu Nov 30, 5:25 am)
Re: git and bzr, Andreas Ericsson, (Thu Nov 30, 5:45 am)
Re: git and bzr, Theodore Tso, (Thu Nov 30, 1:01 pm)