Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2006 » November » 28

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@...>
Cc: Carl Worth <cworth@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 - 12:33 am

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:


This argument has its converse.  What you should _not_ have to worry 
about all the time is whether your index really includes all the changes 
you want included in your next commit.

And whether wanting to leave local changes in the working directory 
without commiting them actually happen more often than wanting to commit 
every changes is arguable.

What should be pretty consensual though, is the fact that having 
experienced GIT users add an alias for "commit" actually becoming "comit 
-i" to preserve the current behavior is much easier than asking new GIT 
users do the same but with "commit -a".

So in that context I think having commit without arguments meaning 
commit -a is a pretty sensible default.  And I don't think it has any 
influence on the "learning about the index" issue.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Junio C Hamano, (Tue Nov 28, 11:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Daniel Barkalow, (Wed Nov 29, 8:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Nicolas Pitre, (Wed Nov 29, 12:33 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Junio C Hamano, (Wed Nov 29, 3:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Carl Worth, (Wed Nov 29, 7:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Nov 29, 7:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Nicolas Pitre, (Wed Nov 29, 2:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Junio C Hamano, (Wed Nov 29, 2:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Steven Grimm, (Wed Nov 29, 3:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Nov 29, 4:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Junio C Hamano, (Wed Nov 29, 4:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a"., Seth Falcon, (Thu Nov 30, 1:24 am)
xdl_merge(), was Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean..., Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Nov 29, 5:50 pm)