[WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@...>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@...>
Date: Saturday, November 18, 2006 - 5:15 am

Time needed to execute git-peek-remote in my box with cold cache currently is:

- git tree 2.347 ms
- linux tree 2.144 ms

And refs are *already* packed in both repos.

Looking at packed-refs file, it contains something like:

d9b0f913ce0508fcc83e642e0241f373428368e5 refs/tags/v1.4.3
4314f5982d2aac08001a977fc0b1b611e858e025 refs/tags/v1.4.3-rc1

while I would need something like git-peek-remote output,

d9b0f913ce0508fcc83e642e0241f373428368e5        refs/tags/v1.4.3
e0b0830726286287744cc9e1a629a534bbe75452        refs/tags/v1.4.3^{}
4314f5982d2aac08001a977fc0b1b611e858e025        refs/tags/v1.4.3-rc1
1965efb1599f59b8e3380335d1fa395e2008a30b        refs/tags/v1.4.3-rc1^{}

Because the sha value a tag points to is needed to match against
git-rev-list output so to identify tagged revisions.

Would be possible to store in packed-refs also the dereferenced tag
info, so that cold opening of a repository would be much faster?

Just to give an idea, with warmed up cache, refs reading times are:

- git tree 43 ms
- linux tree 28 ms

Thanks
Marco

P.S: In case it's not clear I don't suggest to read directly the
packed-refs file with the added info, but always to use
git-peek-remote that _would_ became much faster.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Marco Costalba, (Sat Nov 18, 5:15 am)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Nov 18, 2:38 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Petr Baudis, (Sat Nov 18, 2:43 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Marco Costalba, (Sat Nov 18, 2:47 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Nov 18, 3:04 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Marco Costalba, (Sat Nov 18, 8:28 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Nov 18, 9:11 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Marco Costalba, (Sun Nov 19, 5:40 am)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Nov 19, 2:05 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Marco Costalba, (Sun Nov 19, 3:07 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Nov 19, 4:18 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Marco Costalba, (Sun Nov 19, 4:09 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Nov 19, 4:36 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Marco Costalba, (Sun Nov 19, 6:25 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Nov 19, 7:26 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Junio C Hamano, (Sun Nov 19, 5:01 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Nov 19, 5:14 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Nov 19, 4:44 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Nov 18, 9:40 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Nov 18, 9:45 pm)
Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Nov 18, 9:59 pm)