Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts

Previous thread: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts by Jakub Narebski on Friday, November 17, 2006 - 9:25 am. (13 messages)

Next thread: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts by Jakub Narebski on Friday, November 17, 2006 - 9:45 am. (1 message)
To: <git@...>
Date: Friday, November 17, 2006 - 9:32 am

What about proposed (and I think not accepted) merge strategy
"rebase" (formerly called "subordinate" or something like that)?

--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git

-

To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Date: Friday, November 17, 2006 - 12:49 pm

That sounds very interesting. Has it ever been implemented, or only
discussed?

--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org
-

To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@...>, Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Date: Friday, November 17, 2006 - 1:41 pm

There was some implementation with warts

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/30068
Message-Id: <20061025155009.GD5591@parisc-linux.org>

which didn't got corrected and resent.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
-

Previous thread: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts by Jakub Narebski on Friday, November 17, 2006 - 9:25 am. (13 messages)

Next thread: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts by Jakub Narebski on Friday, November 17, 2006 - 9:45 am. (1 message)