On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:26:05 -0500, Shawn Pearce wrote:... Yes, this was my exact thought when reading what Linus wrote. ORIG_HEAD might be fine and all, but it pales in functionality compared to what reflog provides. I would very much like to see reflog getting first-class citizen support in git: 1. Be on by default 2. Get documented in all the right places, (much better than adding documentation for ORIG_HEAD in my opinion) 3. Tighter integration with branch manipulations. Do we already delete reflog when deleting a branch? We don't have a branch rename operation, but if we get one, renaming the reflog should go hand-in-hand, etc. -Carl
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Trent Piepho | Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
git: | |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2] |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
