Hi, On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:Never ever underestimate pet peeves. If we give many people an obvious reason (however trivial and bike-shed-coloured) to complain, they will complain. If we pull (pun intended) that reason away under their collective backsides, they will have to find another reason to complain. But by the time they found something, they will already be happy git users! But since you just provided a patch to make life easier on non-gitters, I guess you agree with that already. And hopefully you also agree that enhancing the syntax of git-merge to grok "git-merge [-m message] <branch>" and "git-merge [-m message] <url-or-remote> <branch>" would be a lovely thing, luring even more people into using git. Maybe they even start complaining about subversion and CVS calling a merge "update", who knows? Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Con Kolivas | Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Alan Stern | Re: [linux-pm] Re: Hibernation considerations |
git: | |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git-diff on touched files: bug or feature? |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: MinGW port - initial work uploaded |
| Kay Sievers | Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml? |
| Marek Zawirski | [EGIT PATCH 00/31] Push GUI, GUI improvements, various jgit stuff |
| frantisek holop | nptd regression in 4.2 |
| Thilo Pfennig | OpenBSD project goals |
| Luca Dell'Oca | Authenticate squid in Active Directory |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Julius Volz | [PATCHv3 00/24] Add first IPv6 support to IPVS |
| Paul Moore | [RFC PATCH v4 01/14] netlabel: Remove unneeded in-kernel API functions |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH net-2.6.25 1/10][NETNS][FRAGS]: Move ctl tables around. |
| Wenji Wu | Re: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
