Re: git-svn bug?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Date: Thursday, November 16, 2006 - 11:32 am

Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:

Yes, but be warned.  As I just discovered, dcommit always commits up
to the HEAD of the current branch.  So I just did:

git-svn dcommit remotes/git-svn..HEAD~3

And the ~3 was ignored.  :-(
Not a bug, as the doc says that dcommit operates on HEAD, but it would
be convenient to have this work -- especially since reviewing with
diff (or better log -p) seems natural.

+ seth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git-svn bug?, Troy Telford, (Wed Nov 15, 5:05 pm)
Re: git-svn bug?, Seth Falcon, (Wed Nov 15, 6:33 pm)
Re: git-svn bug?, Troy Telford, (Wed Nov 15, 7:09 pm)
Re: git-svn bug?, Shawn Pearce, (Wed Nov 15, 6:37 pm)
Re: git-svn bug?, Seth Falcon, (Thu Nov 16, 11:32 am)
Re: git-svn bug?, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Nov 15, 5:43 pm)
Re: git-svn bug?, Troy Telford, (Wed Nov 15, 6:55 pm)
Re: git-svn bug?, Eric Wong, (Fri Nov 17, 4:55 am)
Re: git-svn bug?, Troy Telford, (Fri Nov 17, 5:17 pm)
Re: git-svn bug?, Eric Wong, (Sun Nov 19, 12:52 pm)