Hi, On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Lachlan Patrick wrote:It does not. You can fully expect the universe to go down before that happens. The only reasonable worry is about SHA-1 being broken some time in future, i.e. being able to construct a malign version of some source code _which has the same hash_. There were plenty of discussions about that; Please search the mailing list. (The consent was that those do not matter, because an existing object will _never_ be overwritten by a fetch, so you would not get that invalid object anyway.) Hth, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
