"stage files" vs "cached files"

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jerome Lovy
Date: Thursday, October 19, 2006 - 6:45 am

Hi,

after having read tutorial1+2, I thought the following were more or less 
synonyms: index ~ directory cache ~ staging area

But then I discover that --cache and --staged are two different things, 
notably when using ls-files.

The documentation states indeed:
  "--cached   Show cached files in the output"
  "--stage    Show stage files in the output"

I'm a bit confused. Is maybe a "stage file" entry missing in the glossary?

TIA for clarification/pointer.
J
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
"stage files" vs "cached files", Jerome Lovy, (Thu Oct 19, 6:45 am)
Re: "stage files" vs "cached files", Linus Torvalds, (Thu Oct 19, 8:58 am)
Re: "stage files" vs "cached files", Andy Whitcroft, (Thu Oct 19, 8:58 am)