Robert Collins wrote:Revision ids (commit ids) change of course. Therefore rebasing published branches is not recommended, as it is in fact rewriting history. It is however recommended before sending _series_ of patches (work on that series should be done using topic branch) to rebase topic branch they sit on for the patches to apply cleanly on top of current work. Or use StGit or other Quilt (patch management) equivalent. This looks like "bzr graft" is the same as "git rebase". It can deal with conflict, cannot it? P.S. It looks like we have yet another terminology conflict. In git "graft" means "history graft" i.e. file which changes parents of some commits. For example if we have historical repositoy and current repositoy we can join together using grafts (otherwise we would need to rewrite history, as sha1 which serves as commit id includes parents information), e.g. x--*--*--*--*....x--*--*--*--* historical current where 'x' is 'root' (parentless) commit, '--' denotes parentship, and '....' denotes "history graft". -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Zach Brown | [PATCH 3 of 4] Teach paths to wake a specific void * target instead of a whole tas... |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gregory Haskins | [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
