Re: is git-unpack-objects now redundant for 'git-push' and friends?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Junio C Hamano
Date: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 - 10:44 am

Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net> writes:


We've supported more than one packs at the same time from the
day we supported packs.

Primary reason that push never keeps the pack is that explosion
into loose objects hurts you only at the first round and later
pushes are supposed to be much smaller, so changing it to keep
the pack for the initial one has a very small value making it a
very low priority change.  Not keeping the pack on push makes it
possible to always use --thin for pushing if we wanted to.

On the fetch side you could use --keep option when you know the
fetch will be huge.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: is git-unpack-objects now redundant for 'git-push' and ..., Junio C Hamano, (Tue Oct 10, 10:44 am)