login
Header Space

 
 

Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force"

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@...>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@...>, git <git@...>, Charles Lever <cel@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 - 5:57 pm

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:01:40PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:

I commonly also feel the need to "stg refresh" only part of the
current changes.  Allowing to limit the files to be impacted by a
refresh could be a good addition.

It would even be useful sometimes to dispatch changes to a single file
into several patches.  When they are distinct enough to be in
different diff hunks, it is pretty easy to split an existing patch,
but it could also be useful to only refresh a patch with specific diff
hunks.  A possibility would be to add a filterdiff-like "-#<n>" flag,
in addition to the above-suggested "refresh <file>" (and possibly only
allow to specify a single file together with this flag).


Best regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson    <ydirson@altern.org> |
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
                                    |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Pavel Roskin, (Fri Jan 13, 5:24 am)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Catalin Marinas, (Mon Jan 16, 4:18 am)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Pavel Roskin, (Tue Jan 17, 1:01 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Catalin Marinas, (Sat Jan 21, 2:31 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Yann Dirson, (Tue Jan 17, 5:57 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Catalin Marinas, (Sat Jan 21, 2:20 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Pavel Roskin, (Tue Jan 17, 7:16 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Catalin Marinas, (Sat Jan 21, 2:24 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Pavel Roskin, (Sun Jan 22, 1:05 am)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Yann Dirson, (Wed Jan 18, 3:37 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Pavel Roskin, (Wed Jan 18, 8:49 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Yann Dirson, (Thu Jan 19, 5:38 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Pavel Roskin, (Fri Jan 20, 2:23 am)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", J. Bruce Fields, (Fri Jan 20, 2:22 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Pavel Roskin, (Tue Jan 24, 1:30 am)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", J. Bruce Fields, (Tue Jan 24, 1:54 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Pavel Roskin, (Tue Jan 24, 2:17 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Catalin Marinas, (Tue Jan 24, 5:23 pm)
Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force", Karl , (Fri Jan 13, 5:34 am)
speck-geostationary