[somehow the first reply seems to have been lost] YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> writes:I am not familiar with how things are done in ipv6 land, but I wonder if the former is consistent with the existing practice. That is, how does one do something like this, with an ipv6 literal address? telnet 127.0.0.1 80 Is it done like this telnet '[::1]' 80 or telnet '::1' 80 Your patch suggests the former, but I just wanted to make sure. The latter "ssh://[...]" looks like RFC 3986, and I do not have problems with. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series.. |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [klibc] [patch] import socket defines |
