On Monday 07 November 2005 16:47, Nick Hengeveld wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:43:19PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>=20
> >  - http-push seems to still have a bug or two but that is to be
> >    expected for any new code, and I am reasonably sure it can be
> >    ironed out; preferably before 1.0 but it is not a
> >    showstopper.
>=20
> It seems like a minor point, but is this the appropriate name or should
> it be dav-push?  Not that there's anything else in the works AFAIK but
> it's certainly possible that something else could run over HTTP later
> on.

e.g. GIT encapsulated in SOAP

/me *ducks* and *runs*

Ingo Oeser