"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:Yeah, the original proposal (in TODO list) explicitly stated why I chose lost-found instead of lost+found back then, and somebody on the list (could have been Pasky but I may be mistaken) said not to worry. In any case, if we go the route Daniel suggests, we would not be storing anything on the filesystem ourselves so this would be a non-issue. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Eric W. Biederman | [PATCH] nfs lockd reclaimer: Convert to kthread API |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
