signals: protect init from unwanted signals more

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009 - 10:01 pm

Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/linus/f008faff0e2777c8b3fe853891b774ca465938d8
Commit:     f008faff0e2777c8b3fe853891b774ca465938d8
Parent:     43918f2bf4806675943416d539d9d5e4d585ebff
Author:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 2 16:58:02 2009 -0700
Committer:  Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CommitDate: Thu Apr 2 19:04:58 2009 -0700

    signals: protect init from unwanted signals more
    
    (This is a modified version of the patch submitted by Oleg Nesterov
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/18/249 and tries to address comments that
    came up in that discussion)
    
    init ignores the SIG_DFL signals but we queue them anyway, including
    SIGKILL.  This is mostly OK, the signal will be dropped silently when
    dequeued, but the pending SIGKILL has 2 bad implications:
    
            - it implies fatal_signal_pending(), so we confuse things
              like wait_for_completion_killable/lock_page_killable.
    
            - for the sub-namespace inits, the pending SIGKILL can
              mask (legacy_queue) the subsequent SIGKILL from the
              parent namespace which must kill cinit reliably.
              (preparation, cinits don't have SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE yet)
    
    The patch can't help when init is ptraced, but ptracing of init is not
    "safe" anyway.
    
    Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
    Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
    Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 kernel/signal.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 92a1ab0..8bf7a40 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -55,10 +55,21 @@ static int sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
 		(handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
-static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
+static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
 {
 	void __user *handler;
 
+	handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
+
+	if (unlikely(t->signal->flags & SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE) &&
+			handler == SIG_DFL)
+		return 1;
+
+	return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
+}
+
+static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
+{
 	/*
 	 * Blocked signals are never ignored, since the
 	 * signal handler may change by the time it is
@@ -67,8 +78,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
 	if (sigismember(&t->blocked, sig) || sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig))
 		return 0;
 
-	handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
-	if (!sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig))
+	if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git-commits-head" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
signals: protect init from unwanted signals more, Linux Kernel Mailing ..., (Thu Apr 2, 10:01 pm)