smackfs: check for allocation failures in smk_set_access()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Date: Sunday, December 28, 2008 - 5:59 pm

Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=81ea71...
Commit:     81ea714bf148fce35e931edcbdfd3aedda20d1dc
Parent:     74192246910ff4fb95309ba1a683215644beeb62
Author:     Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 22 01:16:15 2008 -0300
Committer:  James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
CommitDate: Thu Dec 25 12:14:55 2008 +1100

    smackfs: check for allocation failures in smk_set_access()
    
    smackfs: check for allocation failures in smk_set_access()
    
     While adding a new subject/object pair to smack_list, smk_set_access()
     didn't check the return of kzalloc().
    
     This patch changes smk_set_access() to return 0 or -ENOMEM, based on
     kzalloc()'s return. It also updates its caller, smk_write_load(), to
     check for smk_set_access()'s return, given it is no longer a void
     return function.
    
     Signed-off-by: Sergio Luis <sergio@larces.uece.br>
     To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
     Cc: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@gmail.com>
     Cc: LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
     Cc: LKLM <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
    
    Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 security/smack/smackfs.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
index ca257df..247dc9e 100644
--- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
+++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
@@ -185,11 +185,15 @@ static int smk_open_load(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
  * the subject/object pair and replaces the access that was
  * there. If the pair isn't found add it with the specified
  * access.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if nothing goes wrong or -ENOMEM if it fails
+ * during the allocation of the new pair to add.
  */
-static void smk_set_access(struct smack_rule *srp)
+static int smk_set_access(struct smack_rule *srp)
 {
 	struct smk_list_entry *sp;
 	struct smk_list_entry *newp;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&smack_list_lock);
 
@@ -202,14 +206,20 @@ static void smk_set_access(struct smack_rule *srp)
 
 	if (sp == NULL) {
 		newp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct smk_list_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (newp == NULL) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
 		newp->smk_rule = *srp;
 		newp->smk_next = smack_list;
 		smack_list = newp;
 	}
 
+out:
 	mutex_unlock(&smack_list_lock);
 
-	return;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -309,8 +319,10 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_load(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	smk_set_access(&rule);
-	rc = count;
+	rc = smk_set_access(&rule);
+
+	if (!rc)
+		rc = count;
 
 out:
 	kfree(data);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git-commits-head" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
smackfs: check for allocation failures in smk_set_access(), Linux Kernel Mailing ..., (Sun Dec 28, 5:59 pm)