Re: CPU Utilization on IBM x3755

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@...>
Cc: <freebsd-testing@...>, <freebsd-performance@...>, <freebsd-hardware@...>
Date: Saturday, August 16, 2008 - 4:18 am

>First and foremost, I'm not sure why you cross-posted this on 3 separate

>It's generally shunned by the FreeBSD mailing list community to

Thanks for this reminder. I am testing my hardware against FreeBSD, and I just want to reach those people under the said areas (testing, performance, hardware) with the hope to get speedy response.

>> Then what should I use? I am interested in getting the detailed info to justify the %CPU idles and utilization.

>Of the entire machine? You can see that in top's header:

>last pid: 84636; load averages: 0.47, 0.14, 0.04 up 79+01:15:18 04:46:01

>Regarding why you're adding up all the individual process statistics: I

Though the header could be conclusive, I should want the specific processes (or threads).
And come up with a list of breakdowns, like:

User (28.6%)
1. Program1 -- 20.0%
2. Program2 -- 8.6%

System(8.2%)
1. SystemProcess1 -- X %
2. (and so on) -- Y %

Then match this by adding up all individual processes statistics. And if I couldn't match, at least I could tell some factors that cause variance.
This variance has really struck my attention. When I run "top -SI", the result was:

last pid: 2746; load averages: 0.20, 0.16, 0.10 up 0+00:07:38
15:54:26
125 processes: 12 running, 100 sleeping, 16 waiting
CPU states:
0.3% user, 0.0% nice, 6.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 93.2% idle
Mem: 42M
Active, 18M Inact, 62M Wired, 20M Buf, 27G Free
Swap:

PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU
COMMAND
17 root 1 171 52 0K 16K RUN 0 6:05 99.02%
idle: cpu0
15 root 1 171 52 0K 16K CPU2 2 6:05 99.02%
idle: cpu2
14 root 1 171 52 0K 16K CPU3 3 6:28 96.58%
idle: cpu3
10 root 1 171 52 0K 16K CPU7 7 6:19 92.24%
idle: cpu7
11 root 1 171 52 0K 16K CPU6 6 6:22 92.09%
idle: cpu6
16 root 1 171 52 0K 16K CPU1 1 6:30 91.26%
idle: cpu1
12 root 1 171 52 0K 16K CPU5 5 6:26 84.47%
idle: cpu5
13 root 1 171 52 0K 16K CPU4 4 6:36 83.50%
idle: cpu4

The header says 12, but there were only 8 processes displayed. Sometimes it goes down to 10, but not 8.
Hope you can shed me more lights on this.

_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Myrinet 10GE performance on 7.0-CURRENT, Petr Holub, (Tue Oct 9, 1:38 pm)
ACPI-fast default timecounter, but HPET 83% faster, Pieter de Goeje, (Sun Apr 26, 7:50 pm)
Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Sean Chittenden, (Mon Jun 2, 12:54 am)
Re: Disk Throughput test, Stephen Sanders, (Thu Oct 23, 1:50 pm)
Re: CPU Utilization on IBM x3755, Won De Erick, (Sat Aug 16, 4:18 am)
RELENG_7 heavy disk = system crawls, grarpamp, (Fri Aug 7, 5:17 am)
Re: AMD or Intel?, Francisco Reyes, (Thu Sep 13, 7:44 pm)
Re: RELENG_7 heavy disk = system crawls , Dieter, (Sat Aug 8, 1:33 am)
Re: ACPI-fast default timecounter, but HPET 83% faster, Garrett Cooper, (Sun Apr 26, 10:27 pm)
Re: ACPI-fast default timecounter, but HPET 83% faster, John Baldwin, (Thu Apr 30, 8:46 am)
Re: ACPI-fast default timecounter, but HPET 83% faster, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jun 14, 8:39 am)
Re: CPU Utilization on IBM x3755, Chris Elsworth, (Sat Aug 16, 1:33 pm)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Bruce Evans, (Mon Jun 2, 6:19 am)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Gary Stanley, (Mon Jun 2, 3:55 pm)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Sean Chittenden, (Mon Jun 2, 3:05 pm)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Bruce Evans, (Tue Jun 3, 6:14 am)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Gary Stanley, (Mon Jun 2, 1:39 am)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Bruce Evans, (Mon Jun 2, 6:55 am)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Gary Stanley, (Mon Jun 2, 3:51 pm)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Claus Guttesen, (Mon Jun 2, 4:01 am)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Bruce Evans, (Mon Jun 2, 7:25 am)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Sean Chittenden, (Mon Jun 2, 3:11 pm)
Re: Micro-benchmark for various time syscalls..., Bruce Evans, (Tue Jun 3, 5:31 am)
Re: Myrinet 10GE performance on 7.0-CURRENT, Adrian Chadd, (Tue Oct 9, 8:37 pm)
RE: Myrinet 10GE performance on 7.0-CURRENT, Petr Holub, (Fri Oct 12, 8:16 am)
Re: AMD or Intel?, Palle Girgensohn, (Fri Sep 14, 2:44 am)
Re: AMD or Intel?, Claus Guttesen, (Fri Sep 14, 3:33 am)